HS630 Conf Week 3 Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

HS630 Conf Week 3 Question - Essay Example In the Dam part, different frameworks in addition to redundancies are being used to forestall hazard event; digital weakness results to danger of wellbeing (McGrath, 2011). Control frameworks in Dams are fundamental frameworks when they are in improved structure. Improved control frameworks happen in appropriate structures and work in a way that is sheltered and free from digital uncertainty (Stewart et al., 2011). There exists data sharing models in the Dam segment that relate digital and physical intimidation in addition to methodology for insurance. The Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7 (HSPD-7) has guaranteed nearness of a National framework Plan (NIPP) prompting advancement in addition to progress of reinforcement frameworks (McGrath, 2011). The Federal Emergency Management Agency guarantees the presence of web related instructional classes. These involve different issues of wellbeing concerning Dams. It is hard to keep up solid associations between the private and the open bodies that guarantee appropriate sharing of specialists in addition to assets so as to execute methodologies (McGrath, 2011). Utilization of proper innovation turns into a test on the grounds that different complexities may rise. Presence of untrustworthy shields results to harms because of flooding and different viewpoints (McGrath, 2011). A climatic change presents difficulties since it results to a difference in the progression of precipitation. This change influences dam structures since boundaries utilized during configuration will require acclimation to adjust to the current factors (Stewart et al.,

Ethics n whistleblowing Outline Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Morals n whistleblowing - Outline Example ....14 According to measurements distributed by Public Concern at Work (www.pcaw.co.uk) an ever increasing number of individuals are willing to whistleblow about wrong doing in the work environment. Considering this, assess how associations can build up a compelling way to deal with working environment whistleblowing which assesses the requirements of their partners? Presentation Throughout the years, organizations have advanced. The days on the mechanical age is finished and the expanding huge improvement in innovation has offered path to an improvement in correspondence that might not have been seen over the most recent two decades or somewhere in the vicinity. Thus, this has made ready for more data and at last information to be available for nearly anybody that has a PC and can ride the web. Moreover, another variety of laborers has been recognized that are increasingly liquid and are very not the same as the conventional 8-5 representatives. These are called information laborers and organizations are progressively dependent of these experts as a fundamental piece of their organizations (Serrat 2008). In any case, information laborers or not, organizations and partners must perceive the way that their laborers have quite recently gone more brilliant and are more engaged than any other time in recent memory. This brings a progressively enabled and savvy type of workers that are increasingly fit for blowing the whistle to point out and possibly put a stop on wrong doings in an organization. This additionally achieves a culture of higher moral norms wherein representatives cling to standards and qualities in the direct of their work. Whistleblowing as an Ethical Dilemma This basic truth depicted above has moreover expanded the chance of representatives blowing the whistle on out of line work rehearses or risky working gauges and obviously abnormalities or illegal exercises by the organization or by representatives, officials or even proprietors of the organiza tion. A few years back, an occurrence struck the consideration of the open when a positioning NHS (National Health Service) official was sacked for supporting a subordinate in a clear expose’ of inconsistencies inside the organisation’s framework. Obviously, the official purpose behind the excusal was not about the whistle blowing occurrence yet about certain issues in regards to the executives. This was very sketchy however since the individual being referred to has been with the NHS for longer than 10 years and a half and was an ongoing beneficiary of an administration grant (BBC News 2003). This occurrence can be viewed as a junction where whistle blowing and morals ran collide with one another. The organization or its administration can't transparently utilize the whistle blowing as motivation to fire a representative that has, well to lay it out plainly, earned the anger of the big enchiladas. As a result, this leads whoever is accountable for dealing with the com pany’s issue character to arrange an undignified mass migration as a rule for the organization to conceal any hint of failure and maintain a strategic distance from a rehash of the occurrence. Characterizing Whistleblowing is characterized as a† revelation of illicit, unethical, or ill-conceived rehearses that are under business control by either previous or current association individuals to

October SAT Scores Are In! - UGA Undergraduate Admissions

October SAT Scores Are In! - UGA Undergraduate Admissions October SAT Scores Are In! We received the October SAT scores late yesterday, and we were able to download them into our system this morning. We just updated the myStatus page about an hour ago to show any updated/new scores. We will be running checks next week for any applicants who submitted October SATs but there are differences between their application information and their test score information that causes a matching problem (no SSN on the SAT, different name such as Bill instead of William, birthdate error, etc.). We are also caught up with the mail, so anything that is not showing up as received on the myStatus page should be checked on with the person that is suppose to be sending it, such as your counselor or high school registrar. Have a great weekend, enjoy some Halloween candy, and Go Dawgs down in Jacksonville!

The Battle of Tippecanoe in Tecumsehs War

The Battle of Tippecanoe was fought November 7, 1811, during Tecumsehs War. In the early 19th century, Native American tribes sought to oppose American expansion into the Old Northwest Territory. Led by the Shawnee leader Tecumseh, the Native Americans began to assemble a force to oppose the settlers. In an effort to prevent this, the Governor of the Indiana Territory, William Henry Harrison, marched out with a force of around 1,000 men to disperse Tecumsehs men. As Tecumseh was away recruiting, command of the Native American forces fell to his brother Tenskwatawa. A spiritual leader known as The Prophet, he ordered his men to attack Harrisons army as it encamped along Burnett Creek. In the resulting Battle of Tippecanoe, Harrisons men were victorious and Tenskwatawas forces were shattered. The defeat resulted in a severe setback for Tecumsehs efforts to unite the tribes. Background In the wake of the 1809 Treaty of Fort Wayne which saw 3,000,000 acres of land transferred from the Native Americans to the United States, the Shawnee leader Tecumseh began a rise to prominence. Angry over the treatys terms, he revived the idea that Native American land was owned in common by all the tribes and could not be sold without each giving their consent. This idea had previously been used by Blue Jacket prior to his defeat by Major General Anthony Wayne at Fallen Timbers in 1794. Lacking the resources to directly confront the United States, Tecumseh began a campaign of intimidation among the tribes to ensure that the treaty was not put into effect and worked to recruit men to his cause. While Tecumseh was endeavoring to build support, his brother Tenskwatawa, known as The Prophet, had begun a religious movement which stressed a return to the old ways. Based at Prophetstown, near the confluence of the Wabash and Tippecanoe Rivers, he began garnering support from across the Old Northwest. In 1810, Tecumseh met with the Governor of the Indiana Territory, William Henry Harrison, to demand that the treaty be declared illegitimate. Refusing these demands, Harrison stated that each tribe had the right to treat separately with the United States. Shawnee leader Tecumseh. Public Domain Tecumseh Prepares Making good on this threat, Tecumseh began secretly accepting aid from the British in Canada and promised an alliance if hostilities broke out between Britain and the United States. In August 1811, Tecumseh again met with Harrison at Vincennes. Though promising that he and his brother sought only peace, Tecumseh departed unhappy and Tenskwatawa began gathering forces at Prophetstown. Traveling south, he began seeking assistance from the Five Civilized Tribes (Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole) of the Southeast and encouraged them to join his confederacy against the United States. While most rejected his requests, his agitation ultimately led to a faction of the Creeks, known as the Red Sticks, commencing hostilities in 1813. Harrison Advances In the wake of his meeting with Tecumseh, Harrison traveled to Kentucky on business leaving his secretary, John Gibson, at Vincennes as acting-governor. Utilizing his connections among the Native Americans, Gibson soon learned that forces were gathering at Prophetstown. Calling out the militia, Gibson sent letters to Harrison urging his immediate return. By mid-September, Harrison had returned along with elements of the 4th US Infantry and support from the Madison Administration for conducting a show of force in the region. Forming his army at Maria Creek near Vincennes, Harrisons total force numbered around 1,000 men. Moving north, Harrison encamped at present-day Terre Haute on October 3 to await supplies. While there, his men constructed Fort Harrison but were prevented from foraging by Native American raids which began on 10. Finally re-supplied via the Wabash River on October 28, Harrison resumed his advance the next day. Tenskwatawa, The Prophet. Public Domain Nearing Prophetstown on November 6, Harrisons army encountered a messenger from Tenskwatawa who requested a ceasefire and a meeting the next day. Wary of Tenskwatawas intentions, Harrison accepted, but moved his men onto a hill near an old Catholic mission. A strong position, the hill was bordered by Burnett Creek on the west and a steep bluff to the east. Though he ordered his men to camp in a rectangular battle formation, Harrison did not instruct them to build fortifications and instead trusted to the strength of the terrain. While the militia formed the main lines, Harrison retained the regulars as well as Major Joseph Hamilton Daveiss and Captain Benjamin Parkes dragoons as his reserve. At Prophetstown, Tenskwatawas followers began fortifying the village while their leader determined a course of action. While the Winnebago agitated for an attack, Tenskwatawa consulted the spirits and decided launch a raid designed to kill Harrison. Armies Commanders: Americans General William Henry Harrisonapprox. 1,000 men Native Americans Tenskwatawa500-700 men Casualties Americans - 188 (62 killed, 126 wounded)Native Americans - 106-130 (36-50 killed, 70-80 wounded) Tenskwatawa Attacks Casting spells to protect his warriors, Tenskwatawa sent his men to the American camp with the goal of reaching Harrisons tent. The attempt on Harrisons life was guided by an African-American wagon-driver named Ben who had defected to the Shawnees. Approaching the American lines, he was captured by American sentries. Despite this failure, Tenskwatawas warriors did not withdraw and around 4:30 AM on November 7, they launched an attack on Harrisons men. Benefiting from orders given by the officer of the day, Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Bartholomew, that they sleep with their weapons loaded, the Americans quickly responded to the approaching threat. After a minor diversion against the north end of the camp, the main assault struck the south end which was held by an Indiana militia unit known as the Yellow Jackets. Standing Strong Shortly after the fighting began, their commander, Captain Spier Spencer, was struck in the head and killed followed by two of his lieutenants. Leaderless and with their small caliber rifles having difficulty in stopping the onrushing Native Americans, the Yellow Jackets began falling back. Alerted to the danger, Harrison dispatched two companies of regulars, who, with Bartholomew in the lead, charged into the approaching enemy. Pushing them back, the regulars, along with the Yellow Jackets, sealed the breach (Map). A second assault came a short time later and struck both the northern and southern parts of the camp. The reinforced line in the south held, while a charge from Daveiss dragoons broke the back of the northern attack. In the course of this action, Daveiss fell mortally wounded . For over an hour Harrisons men held off the Native Americans. Running low on ammunition and with the rising sun revealing their inferior numbers, the warriors began retreating back to Prophetstown. A final charge from the dragoons drove off the last of the attackers. Fearing that Tecumseh would return with reinforcements, Harrison spent the remainder of the day fortifying the camp. At Prophetstown, Tenskwatawa was accosted by his warriors who stated that his magic had not protected them. Imploring them to make a second attack, all of Tenskwatawas pleas were refused. On November 8, a detachment of Harrisons army arrived at Prophetstown and found it abandoned except for a sick old woman. While the woman was spared, Harrison directed that the town be burned and any cooking implements be destroyed. Additionally, everything of value, including 5,000 bushels of corn and beans, was confiscated. Aftermath A victory for Harrison, Tippecanoe saw his army suffer 62 killed and 126 wounded. While casualties for Tenskwatawas smaller attacking force are not known with precision, it is estimated that they suffered 36-50 killed and 70-80 wounded. The defeat was a serious blow to Tecumsehs efforts to build a confederacy against the United States and the loss damaged Tenskwatawas reputation. Tecumseh remained an active threat until 1813 when he fell fighting against Harrisons army at the Battle of the Thames. On the larger stage, the Battle of Tippecanoe further fueled the tensions between Britain and the United States as many Americans blamed the British for inciting the tribes to violence. These tensions came to a head in June 1812 with the outbreak of the War of 1812.

Still I Rise By Maya Angelou And Where Is The Love, By The...

Do you ever feel that you are out of place, like a standout in a busy crowd? This is how it feels to be discriminated against due to the colour of your skin. For more than 500 years, coloured people have faced the threat of intrusion and violence; they have been used, abused and discriminated against due to the colour of their skin, their religion or where they come from. In the 21st century racism is still roaming the airs and it is still a common threat; there are currently laws in place to reduce the violence that it brings but still we show ignorance. There have been many poems and songs created to portray this issue; these include ‘still I rise’ by the famous peace protestor Maya Angelou and ‘Where is the love’ by the world known band the Black Eyed Peas. Both of these pieces identify the pressing issues of racism and discrimination that face our society every single day. Still I Rise is a poem written by Maya Angelou. Through this poem, Angelou has used third person which allows the audience to relate to the social issue that she is introducing. Maya Angelou structured this poem in a certain way to be able to portray how much this issue meant to her emotionally and historically. The aim of this poem is to make audiences throughout the whole world aware of racism and discrimination. Maya wrote this piece to show that no matter how many times white people discriminate against blacks that they will always find the positives in everything while staying strong and

Sensory Perceptions Free Essays

They will also hear words, and sounds and will not understand or know what the sounds may be. But not until they are taught they will not know or understand how important these senses will be in life and how these senses will affect them and their learning experiences. Now as we grow into adults our senses will have become interwoven with the way we think and use our minds. We will write a custom essay sample on Sensory Perceptions or any similar topic only for you Order Now When we read a book or even read a recipe to cook we are using eyes as tool. When we listen to music, hear the bird’s chirp, our children laughing we are using another sense which Is our ears to sites to these wonderful sounds that we enjoy. Our ears also hear sounds that we do not want to hear as well. We have to think when we are using our hands to fix a car, play a guitar. We are even thinking and using some of our senses when we have decided to jump out of an airplane for no good reason at all. But no matter what we may be doing we use our senses for some reason or another. Now it is true that â€Å"there Is nothing in our mind unless it is first senses†. (Aquinas, 2007, peg. 53) Why Is this? In order for our senses to work properly our brain Is Involved with our senses ether the Information for our senses to work. Hen we read we are using our eyes to gather the information and it is being put into our minds for reference. We all count on all of our senses to be accurate, and there certain factors that do influence the accuracy of this information that is received by a person’s senses and how it affects their perception of the world. On the other hand there are weaknesses to the amount of knowledge our senses can give. The best way to look at all this our brain Is almost Like a computer, It will only be effective If our brain Is able to process the information correctly and there are no conflicts. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement between the sensory information and the environment and the feedback required to determine the accuracy of the senses. What has been done and used as a sensory exercise is that several people are asked to do a blind fold test, they are then given objects and have to determine what they are by only touching and smelling. Each one Is from a different able to distinguish what the object is by feel. But you have a manager who is given the same object; he or she may not be able to distinguish what the object is. Why is this? It is because they do not work with bricks, this is not their trade. They have to think and guess and what the object maybe, if they have never worked with bricks they will not be able to distinguish the object, but on the other hand they will if they have had a background then they will be able to identify the object. Now our senses do have what you call check and balances in place. For example what you may be feeling when you touch the object it may be negated or influence if you smell the object. The sense of sight is very important, because we depend on this to confirm what e see is real or not real, to distinguished between colors, such as white vs.. Black. Take a person who has been blind all his or her life. They first have learned to use their other senses and they are more keen then others who can see. A blind person knows his or her limitation and is equipped to act more wisely in certain situations. But then you take the person who use to see, but became blind because of an accident, or disease, they keep pretending that they can see and can do things they use to, but because of the blindness they are not able to. But without being able to e we could get run over by a car, trip over hazard objects that could cause us to get hurt. Hearing is another sense that is very important for human survival such as hearing Look out! A rock is about to fall on your head! † to hearing music that we like, to hearing an emergency vehicle coming your way and you need to pull over, to hear the words I love you from your child, But as one knows a person hearing deteriorates through age, so one has to have the aid of a hearing aid to help with the hearing. Then you have the people who have gone deaf or were born deaf and they have to alkali with their hands by learning and using sign language to speak. Touch is very important because one must be able to feel pain, feel if they are being burn, to protect one from dangers. But touch is important to feel a hug, someone holding your hand, touch on your face, this is how once learns. This is also how a blind person describes a person as well. People use the sense of touch such has having diabetes. Identify and describe at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy of sensory data. Source of data and cognitive ability: â€Å"To obtain accurate sensory ATA, the source of data must be received through the senses of sight, hearing, smell and touch acutely sensitive to act like lenses, amplifiers, particle detectors and pressure and gauges to feed the brain to produce accurate sensory perception of the data obtained. † Reliability of facts observed: â€Å"The reception of solid sensory data through the accurate observations would provide facts and data that is vital for sensing -thinking connection or accurate sensory perception. The brain and interpretation of data received: â€Å"Cognitive Ability to analyze sensory data is based on lethal brain. The power of the senses is manifested when information is received in the brain. Inaccurate data sent to the brain will be interpreted falsely. On the other hand, an unhealthy brain will affect the accuracy of messages sent by the senses. Hence, accuracy of sensory data is based on data received and perceived th rough the senses and the cognitive interpretation of the information. (Papers/ Sensory-perceptions) Our senses have a lot due with our brain and our learning. That his or her senses are not perfect than they can try to take steps to improve on he accuracy and look at the changes that need to be made to adapt to the situation. Discuss the roles of â€Å"nature† and â€Å"nurture† with regard to the interpretation and evaluation of sensory data. Nature and Nurture can be traced back to the 13th century known as a catch- phrase for the roles of heredity and environment in human development. For many centuries some scientist from then and even still today believes that when a person behaves or acts a certain way it is genetic which is known as â€Å"the nature theory of human behavior. But on the other hand you have some scientists who believe that cause the way one behaves or thinks that this is a taught and obtained overtime which is known as â€Å"This is known as the â€Å"nurture† theory of human behavior. Scientist are right, but scientist should be asking what information is one born with and if they have this information, is it through nurture or nature. Where the proof lies is where a child already has a lot of knowledge at a very early age before he or she starts school such as playing the piano and reading, and this many lend some credence to the idea that we are actually born with some information already, it Just as to be brought out and used, and it depends how the child learns. In conclusion no matter how one make look at sensory perception they have to know it can be very deceiving as well. How to cite Sensory Perceptions, Papers

The moment of truth free essay sample

For decades, drunk driving has been at the forefront of debate. Stricter laws have been passed across the nation leading to a decrease in drunk driving accidents. However, a new driving threat is quickly taking its place. That threat is texting while driving and many say that it is actually more dangerous than drunk driving. Texting while driving a vehicle has now replaced drinking while driving as the leading cause of accidents and deaths of teenage drivers. Texting while driving and drinking while driving are similar in many ways yet different in others. Everyone knows that drinking and driving is precarious and can be fatal, but texting and driving is equally dangerous. Texting while driving is like consuming about four beers in one sitting. The impairments associated with drunk driving and texting while driving are similar, according to the National Highway Transportation Administration. Both cause distraction and impaired driving that can result in following too closely, not being able to brake on time, weaving into oncoming traffic and even death. We will write a custom essay sample on The moment of truth or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Both of these dangerous activities have caused death and injuries. Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. Over the years, it is proven that there are now more deaths caused from people who are texting while behind the wheel than there are drunk driving. According to the NHTSA 2011 Traffic Safety Facts, laws passed by all 50 states lowering the threshold of illegal driving to . 08 blood alcohol content have resulted in a decrease in drunk driving fatalities. In 2002, there were 12,405 drunk driving fatalities. That number dropped to 9,296 in 2011. While drunk driving fatalities have been decreasing, deadly accidents involving distracted driving are increasing. Drivers are more likely to miss critical traffic signals, are slower to respond to the signals that they do detect, and more likely to be involved in rear end collisions when they are conversing on a cell phone. In addition, even when participants direct their gaze at objects in the driving environment, they often fail to see them when they are talking on a cell phone because attention has been directed away from the external environment and toward the phone conversation. However, what is lacking is the ability for an individual to take on dual task activity. Drinking while driving and texting while driving both take away your full attention from the road. When one drinks ones mind is inflated and can not focus on what is happening around them. When one texts there mind is also in another place and that person isn’t focusing on the road but on their cellular device. Both of these take ones mind to a dangerous place which causes one to lose sight of what they are doing or what they are capable of doing to someone else. Not focusing on the road and the people around ones area can lead to not only the drivers death but to the death or injuries of pedestrians. The drivers mind might feel like it is in one place but really it is in another. Texting in cars and trucks cause over 3,000 deaths and 330,000 injuries per year, according to a Harvard Center for Risk Analysis study. Texting while driving a vehicle has now replaced drinking while driving as the leading cause of accidents and deaths of teenage drivers. Driving a vehicle while texting is six times more dangerous than driving while intoxicated according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The federal agency reports that sending or receiving a text takes a driver’s eyes from the road for an average of 4. 6 seconds which is equivalent to driving 55 miles per hour across the length of an entire football field while blindfolded. Texting while driving takes your eyes off the road which makes your reaction time slower. The average time it takes you to text, read, or look at your phone is five seconds. That is driving approximately five football fields without looking because you are replying back to someone. It is less risky to talk on the phone while driving than texting because your eyes are not off the road as they would be if you were texting. It may seem safer, but you are also distracted and more focused on your conversation. Compared to drinking and driving, texting and driving takes your eyes off of the road but does not impair your reaction time like the other. Texting while driving is illegal in some states and becoming a nationwide law. Driving under the influence is illegal in all states and can put one in jail and the other in a coffin. Drinking in addition to driving impairs your senses and makes you react slower to everything and makes it difficult to walk or see straight as well. Even taking one sip of alcohol impairs your motor skills. This makes you more likely to be in an accident and take an innocent bystander’s life. Over half of teens do not see a problem with texting and driving and think they can do it safely. Studies have shown that roughly twenty three percent of all car accidents involve someone using a cell phone. Of all fatal traffic accidents, one third have involved alcohol. Drunk drivers cause deaths approximately every forty eight minutes. This shows that when someone drinks and drives they are not only putting their life in jeopardy they are putting others in jeopardy as well. With all the similarities and differences that texting while driving and drinking while driving provides, it shows that they are both serious issues that can be avoided at all costs